Comments on: The Winner’s Curse http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/10/14/the-winners-curse/ Science 2.0 and beyond Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:47:52 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: More discussion http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/10/14/the-winners-curse/#comment-2150 More discussion Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:49:30 +0000 http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/10/14/the-winners-curse/#comment-2150 [...] As I said earlier, I thought there would be some interesting discussions. I guess one way of looking at it is that all the ‘good’ data gets published in the prestigious journals and there is nowhere for the ‘bad’ data to be published until after a clinical trial fails. Whether this is a real bias problem is difficult to assess. [...] [...] As I said earlier, I thought there would be some interesting discussions. I guess one way of looking at it is that all the ‘good’ data gets published in the prestigious journals and there is nowhere for the ‘bad’ data to be published until after a clinical trial fails. Whether this is a real bias problem is difficult to assess. [...]

]]> By: David Crotty http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/10/14/the-winners-curse/#comment-1775 David Crotty Wed, 15 Oct 2008 19:12:20 +0000 http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/10/14/the-winners-curse/#comment-1775 A good analysis of this article can be found here: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081013-scientific-publishing-might-create-a-winners-curse.html A good analysis of this article can be found here:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20081013-scientific-publishing-might-create-a-winners-curse.html

]]>