<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Old versus New</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/04/08/old-versus-new/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/04/08/old-versus-new/</link>
	<description>Science 2.0 and beyond</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/04/08/old-versus-new/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 09:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spreadingscience.com/2008/04/08/old-versus-new/#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Thanks for commenting on my article. You make some interesting points. Certainly, rushing into "print" is just as hazardous as procrastination. Indeed, the issue of premature and retarded publication came up, indirectly, in my &lt;a href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/seven-deadly-sins-for-scientists.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;seven sins for scientists&lt;/a&gt; post.

db</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for commenting on my article. You make some interesting points. Certainly, rushing into &#8220;print&#8221; is just as hazardous as procrastination. Indeed, the issue of premature and retarded publication came up, indirectly, in my <a href="http://www.sciencebase.com/science-blog/seven-deadly-sins-for-scientists.html" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/www.sciencebase.com');" rel="nofollow">seven sins for scientists</a> post.</p>
<p>db</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
